Home

Slow Media

Media that demands time produces fundamentally different effects than media optimized for consumption speed.

Back to Ideas

The Distinction

Fast media is optimized for transmission efficiency. Headlines, feeds, notifications—each designed to deliver maximum information in minimum time. The metric is throughput.

Slow media operates on inverse principles. It demands more time than the content technically requires. A long essay. A film with deliberate pacing. A meal that cannot be rushed. The excess duration is not inefficiency—it is the mechanism of effect.

Characteristics of Slow Media

  • Incompressible: cannot be summarized without fundamental loss
  • Accumulative: meaning builds through sustained attention
  • Unrepeatable: the experience changes on re-engagement
  • Transformative: the consumer is different at the end than at the beginning

The Problem

Slow media is losing. The attention economy rewards speed, and consumption patterns adapt accordingly. Even those who value depth find their tolerance for duration eroding.

This creates a feedback loop. As audiences lose patience, creators accelerate. The baseline shifts. What once felt measured now feels interminable.

A Response

The defense of slow media is not nostalgic. It is pragmatic. Certain effects—deep comprehension, genuine transformation, lasting memory—require duration. There is no shortcut.

The practice involves intentional friction. Create barriers to fast consumption: devices in another room, scheduled blocks for slow reading, physical media that cannot be swiped away. The inconvenience is the point.